Henrik Sundberg wrote:
2007/6/10, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com>:
We should try to change one thing at a time. I would suggest do the following in sequence and embarking on one thing only after the previous one has been digested.
a) move to SVN - which seems already underway.
Yes, but a well defined structure is needed. We need to be able to check out the source in the defined structure, or to have tools adjusting the structure.
We have a well defined structure. It may not be optimal - but that's another issue. As far as I'm concerned, SVN vs CVS totally separate from Beman's proposal. Given all the opportunities/issues raised by a move to SVN, maybe the change to SVN should be postponed until Beman's proposal is impemented. One thing is for sure - one thing at a time - and the most important thing first. Robert Ramey
b) implement to Beman's test/release proposal c) consider changes required to support independent library versioning.
/$ _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost