11 May
2005
11 May
'05
8:45 a.m.
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:04:27AM +0100, Russell Hind wrote:
Pavol Droba wrote:
[snip]
As far as I can tell, it seems, that bcc does not handle safe-bool idiom well. Problem leads to boost::iterator_range (currently present in Boost.Range)
Here is a modification of the patch. It doesn't fix the operator! errors (David Abrahams pointed out a possible solution for this, can you add this)?
I'm not aware of it. Can you point where I can find it?
These are the only errors I'm getting now in the test log (see attached).
Will this be applied?
I will definitely apply your patches. Thanks very much for your efford. Regards, Pavol.