Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
... I suggest, for the case of competing libraries, that the contributors are supposed to review the opponent's library but to refrain from voting.
I disagree. The standard I prefer is full disclosure and trust the manager. If there is some reason why special consideration should be given to your review, make that clear. This is true whether you believe that consideration should be positive or negative. Then, write the best review you can. We try hard to make sure our managers are intelligent and suited to the task. I trust them to weigh your concerns and complements appropriately as long as they know any special circumstances. John
In their reviews, there should be a special emphasis on appreciation, learning form the others code and a perspective of possible future collaboration.
Joachim _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost