At 05:11 2005-05-26, Stefan Strasser wrote:
I don't know anything about boost installation on windows, since I'm using a prebuilt debian package, and that's my point:
from the discussion it seems the building process is not as easy as it could be. so, isn't it a better choice to provide binary packages for the most popular compilers instead of writing an installer?
a dir (ls -l for you *nix folks) of *71*33* in my boost built libraries shows 126 File(s) 652,626,996 bytes I suspect most people would balk at downloading something like that (especially since much of boost can be used withOUT building anything)
-- Stefan Strasser
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"