
11 Sep
2008
11 Sep
'08
7:54 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
If you're asking whether such functions should be documented as nothrow after the modification, I think they should: it could be useful information for move-only types (with nonthrowing move ctors).
Yes, documenting the operators as nothrow is what I had in mind, thanks! Best Regards, Gevorg