Hi Felipe,
I have to admit that I don't know much about this work... However, you might look at this site [1] to what works has been done (or hasn't). Hopefully, Boris can provide more information regarding this project.
Hi Andrew, Thanks for the answer. Actually I already read the documentation provided by boost about the status of the project. A lot of work are already done, but I'm sure it still a good part, principally about the interface. My plans include some good interface to the user in aspects like access other process from the computer with signals, and search processes that are currently running. For this, I should read about the process architecture in both platforms to see what can be done, and what is impossible. With this I also could find some common points in both architectures to bring to the boos.process. That is the kind of material I'm looking for. If someone can point me out something to read about this, would be nice. The APIs are well documented on man and MSDN, so I'm not really worried about this part. Another question about the proposal: Does the scheduling and milestones must be extremely precise? -- Felipe de Oliveira Tanus E-mail: fotanus@gmail.com Blog: http://www.itlife.com.br Site: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~fotanus/ ----- "All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us." - Gandalf