"Jeff Flinn" <TriumphSprint2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c97afd$60h$1@sea.gmane.org...
"Johan Nilsson" <johan.nilsson@esrange.ssc.se> wrote in message news:c96p5d$qlg$1@sea.gmane.org...
[...]
matter
if this is a two-step procedure: Allocate in constructors + Initialize in entry or one-step: Allocate and initialize in constructor.
class astate : non_copyable { T& mRef;
astate();
public:
astate( T& aRef ):mRef(aRef){ aRef.somefunction(); }
void init( T& aRef ){ mRef = aRef; mRef.somefunction(); } // not the same
};
No, of course not. I meant: // one-step class astate : non_copyable { ... astate( T& aRef ):mRef(aRef){ aRef.somefunction(); } ... }; versus: // two-step class astate : non_copyable { ... astate( T& aRef ):mRef(aRef){} void entry(){ mRef.somefunction(); } ... }; Regards, // Johan