29 Dec
2014
29 Dec
'14
10:22 a.m.
On December 28, 2014 1:42:54 PM EST, Pete Bartlett
I'm sure Antony meant to change the implementation to match the ideas in Ion's code, not use the test implementation he showed.
But isn't the whole idea to depend on Boost.Move so that swap can benefit from move emulation? As Peter said, a new Boost.Swap could depend on Move, but Core should not.
It could be implemented based upon C++11 move semantics, when available. If there were a way to detect and use Boost.Move without requiring a reference to it, that would be ideal, of course. ___ Rob (Sent from my portable computation engine)