Re: [boost] [core/noncopyable][test/boost::unit_test::singleton] massive test failures

Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:

There's a problem with noncopyable and boost::unit_test::singleton in Intel 13 for Linux in C++11 compatibility mode that's rippling through many Boost libs. [...]

Not that this has anything to do with the specific issue, but I wonder why noncopyable has been changed to use the shiny new =delete/constexpr/=default features - there wasn't anything wrong with the old implementation. I also wonder if people realize that noncopyable is now, by my reading of the standard, a trivial class. This includes trivially copyable.