Sent from my iPhone On Mar 6, 2009, at 5:30 AM, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com
wrote:
Scott McMurray skrev:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 18:29, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> wrote:
I do not want to supply the whole interface of vector. Why not?
It's a lot of work, so if rather have a reason to do this. And in general it is not a drop-in replacement for vector, so there is no reason to pretend it is.
For the operations that they have in common, it is almost a drop-in replacement. I say almost, because this class is really about speed, and often don't allow overlapping ranges, assignment to *this et I think anything that's an "almost" needs an explicit rationale. I really don't, for example, see why the self-assignment check is worth omitting.
The rationale would be simplicity, speed and less generated code.
-Thorsten