On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Richard Webb <richard.webb@boldonjames.com> wrote:
Phil Richards <news <at> derived-software.ltd.uk> writes:
It certainly looks out of date with regards the release note for 1.41.0.
It looks to me as if all the compilers listed on the current summary.html for the release are "primary platforms", and I don't understand, therefore, why they aren't all highlighted in bold, and why they don't appear on the "unresolved issues" page.
The explicit-failures-markup.xml on the release branch lists the following compilers as 'required' :
acc darwin-4.0.1 gcc-4.1.2_sunos_i86pc gcc-4.1.3_linux gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1_hpux_ia64 gcc-4.2.1_linux_x86_64 intel-linux-9.0 intel-vc8-win-10.0 intel-win-10.0 msvc-7.1 msvc-8.0 msvc-8.0_64
Which is a bit out of step with the compilers that are actually being tested on that branch. Looks like it would be usefull to reconsider this list.
Agreed. I'll update it. --Beman