6 May
2010
6 May
'10
6:20 p.m.
on 06.05.2010 at 22:12 vicente.botet wrote :
performance is an important thing but i will not go C anyway
I was referring to Boost.LA. But if you need configurable sizes for your matrixes
yes i got it i respect boost la approach but it does not serve my purposes
i haven't yet uBLAS docs claim there is no abstraction penalty for relativly large matrices but i don't know with what kind of C code they compared, maybe it is inefficient by the same factor as ublas routines giving apparently no abstraction penalty
The best thing to do is check it yourself. It should be not too complex.
i'll end up with it eventually -- Pavel