On 01/31/2010 02:56 PM, Thomas Klimpel wrote:
Wasn't there a "rejected proposal for" logo? I guess it was dropped for the same reason that "under construction for" was renamed to "under construction". How about "in preparation for" and "rejected by"? These would at least make a statement about the relation to boost.
IMHO, the "rejected" logo makes a disservice for the library, as it marks it as something of inappropriate quality for Boost in eyes of users. Therefore I'd like it to be rephrased to something more neutral, such as "unofficial extension" or something of that kind. LOL! I can't imagine anyone would proudly proclaim "my software was rejected by boost!" If they are rejected by boost though, they have no business showing a boost logo associated with their software (unless
Andrey Semashev wrote: they're using boost, then they could have the using boost logo). I agree that things like using should be blue. I feel that things that say, "I'm not a part of boost yet but I want to be", should be in red so that people notice that this isn't boost. I'm glad to see some good conversation here. What's the difference between "proposed for" and "under construction for", and is it a big enough difference to have both? Patrick