On 9/13/2011 5:22 PM, Joel Falcou wrote:
On 13/09/2011 04:08, Joel de Guzman wrote:
Sorry about that. I was just reacting to Joel F's note saying "- fusion is also a big hitter" in a thread titled "[proto] Looong compile times and other issues". I was just defending Fusion with clear proof that the overhead is not due to Fusion and that proof happens to come from Phoenix2 which uses Fusion exclusively.
I agree. Let's not point fingers. I would've expected Joel F to substantiate any claims like that with real numbers, lest it starts to sound more like spreading FUD.
Regards,
Shortcut are to be blamed, qs Eric said, I was pointign out that, in some case, the cocktail fusion in proto transform leads to surprising CT and that, before seeign John code, it *may* be the case. I am using Fusion et al. for like eveyrthign, I start to know when and how stuff an get wrong, i wont take on me to spread FUDs on this subject.
Ok, fair enough. I'm sorry if I overreacted. I did not intend to say that you are intentionally spreading FUD. What I meant to say is that sweeping statements like that are easily misconstrued and should better be substantiated by sufficient explanation, code and real benchmarks. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com