27 Apr
2007
27 Apr
'07
7:18 p.m.
On 04/27/2007 01:17 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
Maurizio Vitale wrote:
What is the rationale for not having proto::tags match the corresponding mpl metafunctions?
For instance mpl has plus and proto has add (but unary_plus).
Oh my. You're right, that's awful. I'll fix these.
Well, as long as you're aiming for consistency, why not do the following renames: proto::_ -> proto::true_ proto::not_<_> -> proto::false_ ?