1 Jun
2010
1 Jun
'10
2:54 p.m.
At Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:42:27 +0100, Anthony Williams wrote:
Richard Peters wrote:
I could understand if a recursive_mutex costs a handle, except that in boost 1.34 they didn't so I wonder if this was an accident or a deliberate change. And most important: Is there a way to get the same behavior as in 1.34 where a mutex did not cost me one handle each?
No, there is not.
Why do you need so many mutexes?
Yeah, as a threading non-expert but somewhat educated bystander, what Richard described smells like a design with many locks at object granularity, which is almost always a mistake. Have you considered revisiting the architecture? -- Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com