2011/1/11 Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com>:
At Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:56:47 +0100, Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
2011/1/10 Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess@nist.gov>:
So should I do same mistake with CppDB and wait for another year to get it reviewed and maintain two versions?
Just to put out an idea: it seems to me developers tend to be more interested in submitting libraries than doing reviews or being review managers. Maybe boost could balance the scales by requiring library submitters to either be a review manager or review a couple submissions from others before their library can be accepted.
+1 That's what I thought: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2010/05/166423.php
Maybe it's time to refresh those ideas and to implement them instead of only discussing them.
+1. What do the review wizards think of this idea? If they're on board, I don't think there's anything standing in the way.
And the vision that was planted in my brain Still remains Within the sound of silence . . . http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2010/05/166423.php