24 Oct
2007
24 Oct
'07
6:37 p.m.
shunsuke wrote:
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
This change is a mistake. Please, back it out. oK. Done.
Why not call boost_range_begin from range_begin?
Not a bad idea ... but this doesn't address the problem of the changed meaning of the boost::range_iterator<> metafunction. (E.g., in your scheme, what is the return type of range_begin()?) -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com