10 Nov
2005
10 Nov
'05
2:24 a.m.
Graham Bennett wrote:
Yes, some degree of separation is a must. Libxml2 is a very good and portable library, but explicit dependencies are a bad thing, especially if they can be avoided easily.
Easily ?!? You can't be serious. 'No dependencies' would imply to reimplement the functionality provided by libxml2 entirely inside boost. If that is easy I wonder why it hasn't happened so far. Regards, Stefan