Re: [boost] different matrix library?

DE wrote:

it seems reasonable but it can be implemented through non-member function and still be readable even more readable acually

set(m, list(x, y), val);

or even

set(m, list(x, y)) = val how can this be more readable than m(x,y) = val ???

-- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35