Re: [boost] async-mqtt5 is CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED

On 1 Nov 2024, at 17:39, Christian Mazakas via Boost wrote:

Alright, seems like no one else has any strong feelings.

I would like to register opposition, for the future, to one of the arguments which was advanced by the RM: that a recommendation to reject, based supposedly on the feeling that "the library should be something else" can be ignored or discounted. I dont know enough about the particulars in this case, maybe reasonable in this case, but I dont want to hear this argument in the future again. If the reviewer is expressing that the design is flawed, that should be weighted on its technical merits. Cheers, Kostas