Paul A Bristow wrote:
| -----Original Message----- | From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org | [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Matias Capeletto | Sent: 09 August 2006 14:59 | To: boost@lists.boost.org | Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Bimap - Informal Review Request | | On 8/9/06, John Maddock <john@johnmaddock.co.uk> wrote: | | > That aside, it looks like a very successful SOC to me, and | to be a worthy | > addition to Boost. Very nice looking docs too BTW!
Nice docs indeed - though I noticed a intially puzzling spelling mistake at
http://cablemodem.fibertel.com.ar/mcape/boost/libs/bimap/doxydoc/namespacebo ost_1_1bimap_1_1tags.html
"A ligth non invasive idiom to tag a type"
ligth should be 'light'?
This appears twice. It looks like it should indeed be "light" as the correct spelling is used towards the bottom of the page. There are rather a lot more typos on this page: * "can not inherited" - should this be "cannot inherit"? * "another level of indirection, an example ..." is a run-on sentence. Replace the comma with either a semicolon or a full stop (a period), thus: "indirection; an example" or "indirection. An example" * "are intend" should be "are intended" * "user do not" should be "user does not" * "suitted" should be "suited" * "As an optional" - should this be "As an option"? * "in the indexed by declaration" - this doesn't seem to make sense, but I haven't looked at what it refers to * "refered" should be "referred"; "referred by it" should be "referred to by it" * "writer point of view" should probably be "writer's point of view" * "more simpler" should be "simpler" * "built-in", "non-invasive" (in three places), "user-friendly" (in two places) and "multi-index" should all be hyphenated. Could I respectfully suggest that you ask someone to proof-read your documentation? This will greatly aid the user. Paul (hoping he hasn't made any typos of his own in this email)