I'm likely completely missing the mark, but if I see a link called "Documentation," that's what I expect to find there, not code libraries (ignoring any arguments concerning "self-documenting code" for the nonce). In other words, (sorry for the C, but doing it in C++ obfuscated the poor pun), Documentation = *RTFM; I'd expect to see links to both "Boost Libraries" and "Boost Documentation" at the same (top) level, even if the libraries *include* the documentation. Or is it just me? Not the first time I'll have been self-referential. Geez, got to stop writing these before the morning coffee. Reid
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Turkanis Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 3:03 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: [boost] Re: Suggestion: link to the libraries page not easy to find
"Marcello Pietrobon" <teiffel@attglobal.net> wrote in message news:406352E4.4040808@attglobal.net...
Hi Boost team,
I don't know where to put this suggestion.
Even if boost is now well known, I think in the boost's home page there should be a well visible, easy to find, link to http://www.boost.org/libs/libraries.htm
because this is exactly what boost is about, I think.
Are you aware that Libraries -> Documentation -> Current Release links to this page, or do you think the label is unclear?
I think it might be slighly more user-friendly if Documentation were a direct link to the libraries page, and Nightly CVS were a separate entry under Documentation, but this is a minor point. Nightly CVS seems to be pretty useless at the moment since most of the links are broken.
Jonathan
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost