"Edward Diener" <eddielee@tropicsoft.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
"Edward Diener" <eddielee@tropicsoft.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Actually, discerning that you probably meant libs/concept_check/using_concept_check.htm and searching the whole file for 'applicatino' finding nothing and replying to your post ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ was easier than adding a new Boost developer to the project. If you're concerned about saving work for others, please post a _patch_ next time.
"Example Getting back to the earlier motivating example, one good applicatino of concept checks would be to insert function_requires() at the top of std::stable_sort() to make sure the template parameter type models RandomAccessIterator."
That's not a patch... but as I was trying to say, the text is already correct in CVS.
My WinCVS is now dead on my machine but I could have sweared when I last updated the file, earlier today, it showed the error. I am glad the typo has been fixed in the meantime. No doubt there is a way to generate a CVS patch and I might be able to figure it out by next year <g> . Yes, I find CVS, and all its equivalences, a gruesome joke on programmers.
cvs diff -du filename -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com