22 Aug
2011
22 Aug
'11
1:35 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
Would something like this be possible to add to Boost.Containers, considering that going through the typical standard routes would have a latency of a couple years at best? I'm told that the Boost.Intrusive containers already supports this.
That would make Boost.Containers not standard-conforming, unless the function was given a different name.
Does the standard require exact function signatures? Olaf