"Lars Viklund" <zao@acc.umu.se> wrote in message news:20101103213628.GM22859@hatchepsut.acc.umu.se...
This compiles with SunStudio versions: * CC: Sun C++ 5.9 SunOS_sparc 2007/05/03 * CC: Sun C++ 5.10 SunOS_sparc 2009/06/03
xlC however, does not fare that well, logs attached.
Nice, we're getting somewhere :) Try the new version ;) If this basic test now compiles, would you perhaps be willing to run some regression tests? ps. a side note, as a purely uneducated guess I would have thought that the IBM compiler is better than the Sun one, however, for the Sun compiler I only had to correct my own error while VisualAge seems to have problems with - out-of-parent-(non-template)-class definitions of member class templates - integral constant expressions in static asserts (but so does Clang and older GCCs) - RVO with classes that derive from boost::noncopyable (but so does Clang and all GCCs)... -- "What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate." Neil Postman