Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
Hi All,
This is a call for reviewers for Boost.Context. The mini review period will end the 11th of this month and we only had 1 review so far and we were expecting a few more.
We had some interesting discussions on the original review period and quite a few people were involved, so anybody who has an interest in boost.context please write a review.
thank you all,
I've been very pleased with your coroutine library for some time. I liked the complete documentation. I aways wondered why it wasn't reviewed and accepted into boost. For my own purposes I made a couple of tweaks which made it header only - when helped me a lot. I looked over the documentation of this library. My question is: what is the relationship between this library and your coroutine library. Would this be a lower level component of the coroutine library. What are the future plans for the coroutine library - if any. I had presumed you just lost interest in persuing a boost revew and just dropped of the map, Now I see you're handling the review for this component. Is there any back story here? Downloading from the git repo - clicking on the link - in the documentation didn't work for me. Is there alternative way to get the source to have look? I was curious to know whether there is a good reason for not making it header only. Robert Ramey