Re: [boost] Any libraries now not under the Boost Software License?

Janek Kozicki wrote:

Whew. That's it. Took me one and a half an hour. Hope this helps.

Based on above research I could tell that only boost::ublas doesn't have BSL, while all the other files are simply a mistake that can be quickly corrected...

Thanks for looking into this: I guess it's too late to tell you that the bcp tool can produce a HTML license report in a couple of seconds....! Looks like we still have a bit of chasing up to do on the license front. John.