5 May
2010
5 May
'10
2:24 p.m.
AMDG Chad Nelson wrote:
On 05/05/2010 09:27 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
I have been looking to which Boost libraries provide an interface that "spoils" usual C++ function declaration using macros. So far I found that both Boost.ConceptCheck and Boost.Parameter replace usual C++ function declaration using macros (see sample code below).
Do you know of any other Boost library that "spoils" usual C++ function declaration?
In XInt (not yet an official Boost library), I use macros to define a few fixed_integer operators. Why? Is that a problem?
No. This is somewhat different because it's an implementation detail of your library. In Christ, Steven Watanabe