23 Oct
2013
23 Oct
'13
3:57 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:07 PM, TONGARI J
I wonder if we can choose the underlying container for flat_xxx, for example, use deque instead of vector. Or would it be better to make them as adaptors?
That would be a different question for the container implementor. Experience shows that having the implementation type as a parameter is rarely a good idea. Having a vector as implementation is far enough for me right now but I don't really care as long as the flat_* behaviour and performance are similar. I'm not sure what a deque would enable in this case.