Hello,
Hi Martin.
The formal review for Andrey Semashev's Finite State Machines (FSM) library is scheduled for August 11th to 20th.
What are the intended and actual differences from the already accepted Statechart library?
The main differences are simplicity and performance. The performance tests show difference by an order of magnitude, in the best case for Boost.Statechart. The overall design of Boost.FSM is geared more to compile-time code generation, while Boost.Statechart aims to support more scaled machines and therefore is geared towards run-time. There is a section in the docs that compares the libraries.
Is it correct that Boost.FSM can not defer an events (I didn't found a statement in the docs)? That means in yout tutorial the state Processing consumes the event passed to template< typename T > void on_process(T const&)? If so - how Boost.FSM supports you if the order of passed events are not predictable? Oliver