Vladimir Prus <vladimir <at> codesourcery.com> writes:
joaquin <at> tid.es wrote:
Would it be possible to set up a regression runner that uses CMake instead of Boost.Build so that problems with CMake are treated the same way as "regular" problems?
Why should this be the case? CMake is experimental, and it seems wrong to promote problems with experimental anything to regular problems.
From my point of view, anything that's released along with Boost should be as thoroughly tested as possible. If CMake support is indeed to be given experimental status, then it'd be better to ship its stuff separately.
I think we also have SCons setup for Boost -- should that be also regression tested, and problems treated as regular?
What's the alternative, not testing it or not dealing with the arising problems? Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Invesgitación y Desarrollo