On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 01:44:25 -0400 "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental@thomson.com> wrote:
environment, where I do not have time/permission to build a library on. Even in this scenario I would rather use included version of UTF.
I love Boost.Test, and use it religiously. However, I've always used the lib, and never had need for the "included" feature util this past weekend. However, I could not get it to work immediately as it seemed to not have the same feature set. I was probably doing something wrong, but I could not find any good docs or examples of using it (other than to say include stuff from included directory, which seems to be a bit scant). So, I scp-d everything to another machine which had the libs and did my work there. However, it did remind me that you've said the "included" variant is available, but I could not use it readily. Could you please help me locate more detailed instructions on how to use the "included" variant? Also, I assume compile times are longer, but other than that, what do you lose, if anything, by using the included version? Thanks!