3 Jan
2008
3 Jan
'08
5:49 a.m.
On 01/02/08 23:07, Larry Evans wrote:
On 01/02/08 15:08, Stjepan Rajko wrote:
The review of the Switch library by Steven Watanabe will begin this Saturday, Jan 5th. [snip] The attachment contains an alternative which uses no preprocessing. It uses more memory because of the static fun_vec in:
fun_switch_impl::our_vec
OOPS. I see a flaw in fun_switch. It doesn't handle missing numerals. IOW, the CASES could contain a non_sequential_range, as one of the test_switch.cpp tests shows. Sorry about that :(