[boost] Re: [admin] Overlapping reviews -- should this be allowed?

Jeff Garland wrote:

This leads me to the conclusion that the current review schedule needs to be redone. 1st because IOStreams has been extended and 2nd because we agree that the current schedule is too aggressive. See

http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg11034.php

I realize it is a major pain to rearrange the agreed dates, but I don't think overlapping reviews is the answer.

Thoughts?

I'd also prefer at least two weeks per library, probably followed by a 1/2 week delay before the next review is started. For libs big in functionality like e.g. mpl, spirit, etc. I'd even schedule 3 weeks. Regards, Andreas