Thomas Klimpel wrote:
Then we need a "Developing For" or equivalent logo in addition, because "Proposed for" seems to be reserved for the review queue. I would be also OK with this. I just tried to come closer to a final agreement. (So I was agreeing with Patrick, and explicitly spelled out what it means in my specific case.)
But before it gets on the review queue, it doesn't really have an association with boost and could only use the powered by (if it was using other boost libraries of course)--wait, that was your point wasn't it! Now I get it:) n.b. I think a pre-PROPOSED FOR icon would look really silly, no? My position on this, is that your quickbook generated doc for not-yet-on-review-queue software could link to POWERED BY icon iff your software uses other libraries, but that otherwise it would be premature to claim any association with boost. That's what started this whole discussion on another thread, the use of a boost logo for something that was on review bothered some. The use of a PROPOSED FOR icon for something not on the review queue or any other icon other than the POWERED BY (if appropriate) would also bother some. Patrick