18 Nov
2007
18 Nov
'07
2:01 p.m.
on Sat Nov 17 2007, "Robert Ramey" <ramey-AT-rrsd.com> wrote:
A little greping reveals the following headers which would seem to violate "standard practice". I've tried to exclude those which are "convenience headers" which do nothing but call a bunch of includes for some library.
That's been a standard practice for many years. What we have never done intentionally is to place components that are not a part of a library's documented public interface in namespace boost, nor their headers in boost/. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com