I'm trying to digest the docs for this monster work.
One things that strikes me immediately is that the doc preparation does not use code snippets, and so code is in boring old black'n'white rather than colored syntax. For me, that makes it significantly harder to read (and understand) the code examples.
Ok, I'll see if I can improve this.
It also means that one doesn't have the assurance that 'What You See is What Compiles'.
For most features, the doc provides a link to an example, which I regularly compile.
(I've also having trouble finding things in all the plentiful 'good stuff'. But that's a common (and largely still unsolved) problem with all documentation.)
Paul
Please let me know what is the "good stuff" for you and I'll make it more visible. Cheers, Christophe