David Abrahams wrote:
Is it intentional that http://boost-consulting.com/boost/libs/fusion/doc/html/fusion/extension.html suggests defining the new sequence tag in namespace boost::fusion?
If so, why are you doing that? Inviting people to add definitions in the library's namespace is usually a bad idea.
I agree. Dan is in vacation right now. He's the author of the extension docs. I'll wait for him to do the necessary adjustments.
http://boost-consulting.com/boost/libs/fusion/doc/html/fusion/extension.html...
introduces iterator_base without saying from which header I'm supposed to get it, and without using any namespace qualification. That tends to make things very confusing.
Same here. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net