15 Jul
2012
15 Jul
'12
2:25 p.m.
btw. since you're renaming things, shouldn't BOOST_NO_CXX11_SMART_PTR be BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_MEMORY?
cannot comment on this specific case, but the presence of a header is one thing, the implementation is another: * some compilers provide <atomic> but with an implementation that is incomplete ... * some compilers (at least gcc-4.3) implement rvalue references, but stl containers do not provide emplace semantics. so one does not have precise control via BOOST_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES. tim