3 Oct
2004
3 Oct
'04
11:12 p.m.
On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 18:31:42 -0400, Beman Dawes wrote
At 10:20 AM 10/3/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
I've said it before, but I always found the checking to be much more >of a hindrance than a help.
So presumably you would be in favor of changing the default to "no_check"?
I'll just chime in since we're voting ;-) As an early proponent, and still a user of the portable option, I think either native or no-check is fine as the default. I don't have enough code to really even care about the backward compatibility macro -- it's trivial enough to switch over... Jeff