10 Feb
2004
10 Feb
'04
4 p.m.
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Peter Dimov wrote: [...]
One case where "propagating" exceptions is wrong is when the thread is not supposed to be joined.
When the thread is not supposed to be joined, then all expected exceptions [e.g. thread cancelation or exit] should be caught (but "ignored") and all unexpected exceptions should still terminate the entire process
Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind.
at throw point
We can't do this from the library side.
(that's not the way how exception specification work currently).
We can't change this from the library side either. ;-)