2 Nov
2012
2 Nov
'12
4:18 p.m.
Maybe I (and Nate) can help you with those tests. On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Peter Dimov <lists@pdimov.com> wrote:
Glen Fernandes wrote:
Peter, is the right direction to implement T[] support in shared_ptr or to fix shared_array?
I think that the right direction is to implement shared_ptr<T[]>. In fact, I have already done so. My problem now is that it requires 48 compile-fail tests, each in its own file. :-/
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost