3 Oct
2008
3 Oct
'08
11:47 p.m.
Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
Peter Dimov wrote:
Eh. How about this one:
lambda(_x, _y)[ let. _z = _x + _y, _z * _z ]
I think that the implicit let will be much less of an issue in a lambda context than it is in Python (or Javascript), though.
Doesn't that imply that _a, _b, ... have to be enumerated in the definition of let?
Not sure I understand.
I like to have the possibility of defining new local variable names.
Oh sure you can define new names in Phoenix: actor<local_variable<Key> > E.g: struct size_key; actor<local_variable<size_key> > size; Is that what you mean? Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net