Le 10/12/2015 01:03, Emil Dotchevski a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba < vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
Hi,
These operators could be used for views
So instead of
(m, <http://zajo.github.io/boost-qvm/operator_mod_rationale.html>A42) *= 42; (sorry for the formating)
(m, A42) *= 42
we could have in C++11
ref(m)(4,2) *= 42; ref(m)[4][2) *= 42;
Once you do ref(m) you can have any operator you want for accessing the elements, but that's too inconvenient, and to certain degree against the spirit of the library. I don't see where this is against anything. In QVM you can multiply m1*m2 regardless of their exact static types, you don't have to do ref(m1)*ref(m2) to get the correct op* to kick in. I have not suggested that.
What problem are we solving with this anyway? What's wrong with:
(m,A42) *= 42;
See other post about how controversial seems to be operator,. Well I was just replaying to one of the Q/A of the doc. You say that you don't need [](). I say that on views it is the most clear thing when we use C++11. BTW, qvm::vec and qvm::mat could provide the access operators as well. Vicente