On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 08:36:37AM -0700, Eric Niebler wrote:
Joel de Guzman and I, with the help of many smart folks on the boost-docs list[*], have been working on improving the look-n-feel of Boost's documentation. We're ready to commit the new style, but wanted to check here first.
Volodya was good enough to put up a copy of Boost's docs with the new style applied. You can preview them here: http://zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su/~ghost/boost_docs/
Please say whether you like the new style or not. If not, be specific about why.
I don't want to go into aesthetics, but overall I like it. However, the W3C HTML validator <URL:http://validator.w3.org> does not like the pages... I don't know much about BoostBook and how the HTML pages are generated, but is it possible to add a doctype and fix the remaining errors? IMHO a group like Boost should aim where reasonable for code conforming to the respective standards - be it C++ or HTML. Regards Christoph -- http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/Mitarbeiter/cludwig.html LiDIA: http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/LiDIA/Welcome.html