Hi Mathias, Op den Middeweken 31 März 2010 Klock 12:11:20 hest Du schreven:
Jürgen Hunold a écrit : You don't need to define it, declaring it should be enough (and better).
Yes, of course. Modified patch attached. Thanks.
Actually I don't even see how it can work when you define it, since it doesn't know how to initialize the reference member.
Well, I think that gcc can not create a sensible default constructor in this case and therefore issues the warning. It does not seem to care if a constructor is provided by the user. And that is all I want ;-)) Yours, Jürgen -- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Ingenieurgesellschaft für * voice: ++49 511 262926 57 ! Verkehrs- und Eisenbahnwesen mbH * fax : ++49 511 262926 99 ! Lister Straße 15 * juergen.hunold@ivembh.de ! www.ivembh.de * * Geschäftsführer: ! Sitz des Unternehmens: Hannover * Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Siefer ! Amtsgericht Hannover, HRB 56965 * PD Dr.-Ing. Alfons Radtke !