11 Oct
2007
11 Oct
'07
5:18 p.m.
On 10/11/07, Marco <mrcekets@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks to you Marco, I hope that you find the time to propose your hints and suggestions, they will be very appreciated.
Just a question. Why do you foreseen f.set<5>(f6); f.set<sig5_t>(f5); instead of just f.set(f6); f.set(f5); Normally you should have a good reason to allow redundancy in the API, in other words if the above just works the by-index and by-sig features would seem to me more error prone and I fail to see the advantages. Thanks Marco P.S: for "redundancy" I don't mean that does exist more way to do the same thing but that the API f.set<5>(f6); specify two times where to store f6, one directly with <5> and one indirect through signature of f6