5 May
2005
5 May
'05
6:14 p.m.
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
important, if i is possible. Rather than reject the library because these problems haven't been addressed, let's try to address them during the review.
That's unacceptable IMO. Review period is not a time to address any issues.
Why not let reviewers try? No one is forced to write a review. If these issues can't be resolved, and the review manager -- informed by the opinions of reviews -- concludes they are show-stoppers, the library will be rejected. Jonathan