Nathan Ridge wrote:
Neil Groves wrote:
I'm very happy for Nate to apply patches. I have seen enough of Nate's good work to know that he would add significant value. I am very keen for this to happen as it will be good for the user-base generally. I think we can just do this without a change to policy.
Is it OK for you to be a sub-maintainer of Boost.Range? I think becoming a Boost developer is an exciting experience, isn't it?
I am honoured that the Boost[.Range] community deems me fit for this responsibility. [...] So, assuming a bit of a slow start given the above is acceptable to the community, I am happy to become a sub-maintainer of Boost.Range, and I look forward to working together with you (all) in this role!
Thanks for your positive reply, Nate. This is indeed good news for the Boost community. Start-up period is definitely not a problem, let's proceed step by step :) Regards, Michel